More evidence for women warriors in the Viking Age

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Neil of Ormsheim
Posts: 424
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 1:37 pm
Location: Deepest Darkest Leeds

More evidence for women warriors in the Viking Age

Postby Neil of Ormsheim » Sun Sep 10, 2017 4:58 pm

I'll just leave this here.........
I'm fairly sure that it might just provoke a little discussion.........

https://phys.org/news/2017-09-genetic-p ... riors.html


Lurv 'n' Kizzez

FionaDowson
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 7:00 pm

Re: More evidence for women warriors in the Viking Age

Postby FionaDowson » Mon Oct 02, 2017 10:09 am

Warriors need to be intelligent then? WHo'd have thought it.....



User avatar
PaulMurphy
Posts: 200
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 8:40 am
Location: Cambridgeshire
Contact:

Re: More evidence for women warriors in the Viking Age

Postby PaulMurphy » Mon Oct 02, 2017 12:10 pm

Read the response by Judith Jesch - it's very entertaining, and informative. http://norseandviking.blogspot.co.uk/20 ... t.html?m=1

So, let's summarise:

1. They may not have the correct body, as the labelling and storage of the bones was haphazard in the C19th
2. The presence of weapons alone does not make someone a warrior, as it could be a symbol of status
3. Despite 'a full osteological and contextual analysis' of the bones by one of the authors, they provide no evidence of enhanced muscle mass or repetitive wear and tear on the skeleton from warrior activities, and they state that there is no sign of any injury on the skeleton

So yet again we return to the basic problem - until such time as we find written reference to female warriors, or we find a skeleton which shows multiple healed weapon injuries alongside clear evidence of regular strenuous physical activity, the jury remains convinced that they did not exist.


Paul Murphy
Tournée & The Vikings
______________________________________


Return to “410-1100”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests