Something Viking types might appreciate

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
zauberdachs
Post Centurion
Posts: 695
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:38 pm

Something Viking types might appreciate

Postby zauberdachs » Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:04 am



Do not be loath, diligent reader, to winnow my chaff, and lay up the wheat in the storehouse of your memory. For truth regards not who is the speaker, nor in what manner it is spoken, but that the thing be true - Nennius, 8th century

User avatar
Neil of Ormsheim
Posts: 424
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 1:37 pm
Location: Deepest Darkest Leeds

Postby Neil of Ormsheim » Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:13 pm

:shock: :shock: :shock:
First of all, anyone standing with their shield in that on guard position is crying out for a cross strike from a spearman or being potted b an archer.

The second two parts also show why that first move is not advisable unless your opponent is either scripted to lose or is asleep :oops:

It may look pretty but that does not make it very good sense.


Lurv 'n' Kizzez

User avatar
Phil the Grips
Absolute Wizard
Posts: 2000
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:01 pm
Location: Auld Reekie- capital village o' Jockland
Contact:

Postby Phil the Grips » Wed Dec 05, 2007 2:40 pm

It's not battlefield technique (very little historical martial arts is)- it's for use in monomachia-and certainly not for use until the shieldwall has collapsed and things have scattered somewhat if you do use it there.

An arrow's going to get you in most situations as it is, if there is a spear nearby then deal with it appropriately ( and using inside and outside wards works against spears in my experience too) and then use this style against another swordsman.

Context is everything and understanding that context and matching it to your style of combat is as much a part of studying martial arts as anything.

The makers recognise it is subtley flawed (deliberately so in parts so as to show technique clearly for the uninitiated so tempo and measure are exagerated) and have developed since under advisement from the originator of this theoretical model.

When performed well it works very well indeed and is far more likely than the "stand behind a door and bash away" that you see in reenactment as it matches the evidence ( a consistent record of iconography from ancient to modern showing similar attitudes towards shieldpaly) we have quite nicely.

The original article can be found in SPADA and SPADA II, both avaialble through Amazon.


--Angels also carry weapons--
http://www.blackboarswordsmanship.co.uk/

User avatar
Neil of Ormsheim
Posts: 424
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 1:37 pm
Location: Deepest Darkest Leeds

Postby Neil of Ormsheim » Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:15 pm

I do not advocate "standing behind a door and bashing" but an on guard position like that is just sooooooooooo exposed. I, for one, seeing anyone trying this stance would say "Thank you very much" and job them. It may work as an awareness training exercise but that would, I suspect, be all.


Lurv 'n' Kizzez

User avatar
zauberdachs
Post Centurion
Posts: 695
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:38 pm

Postby zauberdachs » Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:20 pm

I don't think it's a guard position.

It's from Talhoffer so it will be "flash thing you can do if you find a numpty doing this"


Do not be loath, diligent reader, to winnow my chaff, and lay up the wheat in the storehouse of your memory. For truth regards not who is the speaker, nor in what manner it is spoken, but that the thing be true - Nennius, 8th century

User avatar
Phil the Grips
Absolute Wizard
Posts: 2000
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:01 pm
Location: Auld Reekie- capital village o' Jockland
Contact:

Postby Phil the Grips » Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:24 pm

The shield is not held entirely open when in ward but at roughly 70 degrees to the body (with 0 being flat against the chest, 90 being right angles to the body)- a most effective way of holding and using the shield while maintaining good cover of the inside or outside line. It is only fully to 90 when the shields are engaged and measure closed.

All a shield does is close two lines of attack at once so there is no way of closing all lines of attack at any one time with any guard so you "say "Thank you very much and job them" with anything an opponent presents with- this is simply a more effective way of doing it.


--Angels also carry weapons--
http://www.blackboarswordsmanship.co.uk/

User avatar
Neil of Ormsheim
Posts: 424
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 1:37 pm
Location: Deepest Darkest Leeds

Postby Neil of Ormsheim » Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:48 pm

I don't think it's a guard position.

It's from Talhoffer so it will be "flash thing you can do if you find a numpty doing this"


Me too.


Lurv 'n' Kizzez

User avatar
Phil the Grips
Absolute Wizard
Posts: 2000
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:01 pm
Location: Auld Reekie- capital village o' Jockland
Contact:

Postby Phil the Grips » Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:58 pm

zauberdachs wrote:It's from Talhoffer so it will be "flash thing you can do if you find a numpty doing this"

Have you read the article? I shall bring it along tonight as, if you have, you have completely failed to follow its corollary- the defence of a line using the "critical angle" is the essnce of the model.


--Angels also carry weapons--
http://www.blackboarswordsmanship.co.uk/

User avatar
Zachos
Posts: 424
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 5:34 pm

Postby Zachos » Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:09 pm

You will note that everything after the first move is how to counter the first move. Therefore you could leave yourself open to entice someone into an easily counterable attack.


Slowly realizing just how far is still to go.

User avatar
zauberdachs
Post Centurion
Posts: 695
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:38 pm

Postby zauberdachs » Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:18 pm

Phil the Grips wrote:
zauberdachs wrote:It's from Talhoffer so it will be "flash thing you can do if you find a numpty doing this"

Have you read the article? I shall bring it along tonight as, if you have, you have completely failed to follow its corollary- the defence of a line using the "critical angle" is the essnce of the model.


no, not seen any article. Is the above incorrect in some way?


Do not be loath, diligent reader, to winnow my chaff, and lay up the wheat in the storehouse of your memory. For truth regards not who is the speaker, nor in what manner it is spoken, but that the thing be true - Nennius, 8th century

User avatar
Phil the Grips
Absolute Wizard
Posts: 2000
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:01 pm
Location: Auld Reekie- capital village o' Jockland
Contact:

Postby Phil the Grips » Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:49 pm

yes- shall explain in the pub. This is what an Artist would do, an Ignorant stands behind a static shield, and then use to defeat an Ignorant or another Artist.


--Angels also carry weapons--
http://www.blackboarswordsmanship.co.uk/

User avatar
zauberdachs
Post Centurion
Posts: 695
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:38 pm

Postby zauberdachs » Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:50 pm

Phil the Grips wrote:yes- shall explain in the pub. This is what an Artist would do, an Ignorant stands behind a static shield, and then use to defeat an Ignorant or another Artist.


oh indeed, but was the assessment of Talhoffer I gave above incorrect?


Do not be loath, diligent reader, to winnow my chaff, and lay up the wheat in the storehouse of your memory. For truth regards not who is the speaker, nor in what manner it is spoken, but that the thing be true - Nennius, 8th century

User avatar
Phil the Grips
Absolute Wizard
Posts: 2000
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:01 pm
Location: Auld Reekie- capital village o' Jockland
Contact:

Postby Phil the Grips » Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:53 pm

I have little idea about Talhoffer but his model is sound for stechshild (?SP) using open and closed lines and not hiding behind a static door.

He assumes Artist vs Artist in the main since he is a monomachia man.


--Angels also carry weapons--
http://www.blackboarswordsmanship.co.uk/

User avatar
zauberdachs
Post Centurion
Posts: 695
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:38 pm

Postby zauberdachs » Wed Dec 05, 2007 5:04 pm

Phil the Grips wrote:I have little idea about Talhoffer but his model is sound for stechshild (?SP) using open and closed lines and not hiding behind a static door.

He assumes Artist vs Artist in the main since he is a monomachia man.


Definitely, however his work is not a cohesive combat guide but are rather a series of flash things you can do if you find a suitable numpty.

I can't find the image right now, I can bring it tonight, where he demonstrates swinging a longsword by the pommel to cut someone in the leg to break pflug. From that you can get the idea of what I'm talking about.


Do not be loath, diligent reader, to winnow my chaff, and lay up the wheat in the storehouse of your memory. For truth regards not who is the speaker, nor in what manner it is spoken, but that the thing be true - Nennius, 8th century

User avatar
Phil the Grips
Absolute Wizard
Posts: 2000
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:01 pm
Location: Auld Reekie- capital village o' Jockland
Contact:

Postby Phil the Grips » Wed Dec 05, 2007 5:17 pm

That's cos his treatise isn't a "manual of how to" but an advert of "this is some of the cooler stuff that I can teach you if you employ me"- the equivalent of those little "three frame technique" strips you used to get in martial arts magazines.

I think we are arguing the same point from different sides- best done with a pint of spotty chuck in hand :)


--Angels also carry weapons--
http://www.blackboarswordsmanship.co.uk/

User avatar
zauberdachs
Post Centurion
Posts: 695
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:38 pm

Postby zauberdachs » Wed Dec 05, 2007 5:18 pm

indeed :)


Do not be loath, diligent reader, to winnow my chaff, and lay up the wheat in the storehouse of your memory. For truth regards not who is the speaker, nor in what manner it is spoken, but that the thing be true - Nennius, 8th century

User avatar
Aelfric
Posts: 61
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 9:32 am
Location: Cheshire
Contact:

Postby Aelfric » Wed Dec 05, 2007 7:08 pm

I've been useing this guard in single combat (as pointed out it's certainly not a battlefield stance) for a few years now and it certainly does not leave you at all exposed. It is a very, very effective guard that gives attacking options that you simply don't get with the standard shield flat across the body guard and while there are things I don't agree with in the interpretation shown on the film but it's a good demonstration.



User avatar
zauberdachs
Post Centurion
Posts: 695
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:38 pm

Postby zauberdachs » Tue Dec 11, 2007 12:46 pm

Phil the Grips wrote:
zauberdachs wrote:It's from Talhoffer so it will be "flash thing you can do if you find a numpty doing this"

Have you read the article? I shall bring it along tonight as, if you have, you have completely failed to follow its corollary- the defence of a line using the "critical angle" is the essnce of the model.


A fine set of articles, Mr Grips! Would you be interested in having a play around with this at some point in the new year?


Do not be loath, diligent reader, to winnow my chaff, and lay up the wheat in the storehouse of your memory. For truth regards not who is the speaker, nor in what manner it is spoken, but that the thing be true - Nennius, 8th century

User avatar
Phil the Grips
Absolute Wizard
Posts: 2000
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:01 pm
Location: Auld Reekie- capital village o' Jockland
Contact:

Postby Phil the Grips » Tue Dec 11, 2007 12:52 pm

Will do- have to track down my large shield which I haven't seen in 5 years first!

I have a very nice poleaxe primer sitting on my desk too...


--Angels also carry weapons--
http://www.blackboarswordsmanship.co.uk/

User avatar
zauberdachs
Post Centurion
Posts: 695
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:38 pm

Postby zauberdachs » Tue Dec 11, 2007 12:55 pm

hmm... poleaxe would be a lot of fun. It's a dam shame there are only so many days in the week.


Do not be loath, diligent reader, to winnow my chaff, and lay up the wheat in the storehouse of your memory. For truth regards not who is the speaker, nor in what manner it is spoken, but that the thing be true - Nennius, 8th century

User avatar
Phil the Grips
Absolute Wizard
Posts: 2000
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:01 pm
Location: Auld Reekie- capital village o' Jockland
Contact:

Postby Phil the Grips » Tue Dec 11, 2007 1:09 pm

Give up your job and stop playing with poi- then you'll have loads of time!

or employ me so we can dick about in lunchhours ;)


--Angels also carry weapons--
http://www.blackboarswordsmanship.co.uk/

User avatar
zauberdachs
Post Centurion
Posts: 695
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:38 pm

Postby zauberdachs » Tue Dec 11, 2007 1:13 pm

Ah, I have pretty much stopped the whole juggling nonsense in favour of sword nonsense. It'll have to be the job that goes...


Do not be loath, diligent reader, to winnow my chaff, and lay up the wheat in the storehouse of your memory. For truth regards not who is the speaker, nor in what manner it is spoken, but that the thing be true - Nennius, 8th century

User avatar
zauberdachs
Post Centurion
Posts: 695
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:38 pm

Postby zauberdachs » Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:54 pm



Do not be loath, diligent reader, to winnow my chaff, and lay up the wheat in the storehouse of your memory. For truth regards not who is the speaker, nor in what manner it is spoken, but that the thing be true - Nennius, 8th century

User avatar
Neil of Ormsheim
Posts: 424
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 1:37 pm
Location: Deepest Darkest Leeds

Postby Neil of Ormsheim » Wed Jan 23, 2008 6:29 pm



Use number one myself on people who are either asleep or busy watching/fighting someone else. Don't use the others because we don't do head shots and even if not aiming for the head, those stikes would be too close for my comfort (as the aggresor)


Lurv 'n' Kizzez

User avatar
Aelfric
Posts: 61
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 9:32 am
Location: Cheshire
Contact:

Postby Aelfric » Wed Jan 23, 2008 7:00 pm

Yep number one is good and number two works well with a slight adjustment, not sure about number three though, looks to vulnerable for my liking.



User avatar
zauberdachs
Post Centurion
Posts: 695
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:38 pm

Postby zauberdachs » Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:09 am

ha, when compared to the likes of this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxMqoMA3 ... re=related
:)


Do not be loath, diligent reader, to winnow my chaff, and lay up the wheat in the storehouse of your memory. For truth regards not who is the speaker, nor in what manner it is spoken, but that the thing be true - Nennius, 8th century

User avatar
zauberdachs
Post Centurion
Posts: 695
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:38 pm

Postby zauberdachs » Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:48 pm



Do not be loath, diligent reader, to winnow my chaff, and lay up the wheat in the storehouse of your memory. For truth regards not who is the speaker, nor in what manner it is spoken, but that the thing be true - Nennius, 8th century


Return to “410-1100”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests